Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Conversations in Suburban Auckland

AA
View Discussion
Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, N0.1 (detail) Lawrence and Lorenzo Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.1 (detail), Mr Singh Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.2 (detail) Reta Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.3 (detail) Jaz and Lorraine Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.4 (detail) Melanie Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.5 (detail) Shane and Amber Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.7 (detail) Dr.Stan and Smashup Janet Lilo, video still, The Interface Project, No.7 (detail) Hone

What is distinctive in these beautifully relaxed Q&A sessions is the use of music video clips elegantly woven around them, and the willingness of the subjects to now and then sing songs they love in mid-conversation. The eight or nine topics chatted about range from the pros and cons of Auckland as a Super City to the nature of love, and the virtues of two rival deceased hip hop stars.

Youtube

Janet Lilo

The Interface Project

Janet Lilo is a Samoan video artist and AUT graduate whose documentary works or productions of other artists have been seen in many venues nationally, such as ARTSPACE (the Fresh component of the New Artists show of 2009) and City Gallery Wellington (within Heather Galbraith’s 2007 Telecom Prospect). Her work has a strong community emphasis (looking at suburban Auckland), yet the affection she has for the twenty or so people being filmed and presented in this new project here on Youtube, brings an added intimacy - its open but almost private, though of course it’s not. It’s community minded in the discreet sense that within this series of seven short programs there are social agendas such as improving collective power - persuading people to exercise their right to vote - but subtly pushed via nuanced implication, not overt instruction.

What is distinctive in these beautifully relaxed Q&A sessions (each one chopped up and spliced in with other answers from others to the same question) is the use of music video (and occasionally cult film) clips elegantly woven around them, and the willingness of the subjects to now and then sing songs they love in mid-conversation. The eight or nine topics chatted about range from the pros and cons of Auckland as a Super City and which country will win the World Cup, to the nature of love, the virtues of two rival deceased hip hop stars (Biggie versus Tupac) and the availability of information about Aotearoa’s political parties.

Lilo’s editing is such that no one person dominates: they talk for a minute or so and then cut to someone else. One gets a sense of the importance of television, film, music and sport in these people’s lives, getting glimpses of the shaping of individual selves not only through family and communities like gangs, but also through the power of mass media, the way entertainment or social environs can mould a subject’s inclinations.

Lilo’s multi-ethnic (but largely Pacific and Maori) interviewees vary from teenage school pupils in uniform to a sweet little old lady in an electric shopping cart. Called The Interface Project, the series references not only the blending of the individual with the technology of mass media but also the pleasurable physiology of face-to-face dialogue; the gregarious pleasures of convivial company. It entertains by using buckets of charm - most people filmed shine in front of the camera. Even the self-effacing and shy impress with their quiet and dignified charisma.

The series works because of its range of social background and personality types - combined with her use of infectious music. The candour and vibrancy of her subjects propels it along, and she controls the pace. And if Lilo has any vehement disagreements (such as say, when someone admits they have been too apathetic or cynical to vote) she keeps them to herself in order to draw the speaker out - to get at their thoughts and possible reasons.

Through these snippets of conversation she seems to see her art as a catalyst for community discussion, a generator of feedback. It allows the group to evaluate itself in terms of the future, to figure out desirable aims and what the best means are to achieve them.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

This Discussion has 2 comments.

Comment

Janet Lilo, 10:18 a.m. 13 August, 2011

Thank you John, I appreciate your time in reviewing these works. Just a note that the Interviewees are a mix of participants from Takapuna, Glenfield, Otahuhu, Manukau, New Lynn, Henderson, Glen Innes, Onehunga & Sandringham. J :)

Reply to this thread

John Hurrell, 12:20 p.m. 13 August, 2011

Thanks Janet for pointing that out. Will change the headline.

Reply to this thread

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Carbon, as installed at Fox Jensen McCory

Elemental & Versatile Carbon

FOX JENSEN MCCRORY

Auckland

 

Gabriel de la Mora, Gunter Umberg, Matthew Allen, Ceara Metlikovec, Arik Levy, Jan Albers
Carbon

 

7 February - 10 March 2018

JH
Tiffany Singh 's Collaboration is the Future as installed at Melanie Roger.

Singh at Roger

MELANIE ROGER GALLERY

Auckland

 

Tiffany Singh
Collaboration is the Future

 

31 January - 24 February 2018

JH
Role models, curated by Rob McKenzie, as installed at Hopkinson Mossman

Unpicking Identity

HOPKINSON MOSSMAN

Auckland

 

Robert Bittenbender, Ellen Cantor, Jennifer McCamley, Josef Strau
Role Models


26 January - 24 February 2018

JH
Gary Peters, A Slow Take, 2017 (installation view) commissioned by Te Tuhi, Auckland. Photo by Sam Hartnett

Two Site-Specific Paintings

TE TUHI CENTRE FOR THE ARTS

Pakuranga

 

Gary Peters
A Slow Take

 

18 November 2017 - 25 February 2018