Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

Human-Robot Duets

AA
View Discussion
Simon Ingram's Digital Plastique exhibition as installed at Gow Langsford. Simon Ingram, Au court de tennis, 2017, oil on canvas, 1000 x 900 mm. Simon Ingram, Untitled (Wavepool), 2017, oil on linen, 1775 x 1600 mm Simon Ingram, Untitled (Firmament), 2017, oil on linen, 1775 x 1600 mm Simon Ingram, Untitled (Waterview skatepark), 2017, oil on linen, 1775 x 1600 mm Simon Ingram's Digital Plastique exhibition as installed at Gow Langsford. Simon Ingram, Rose et bleu, 2017, oil on canvas, 650 x 600 mm Simon Ingram, Untitled (Digital primitive), 2017, oil on canvas, 1000 x 900 mm Simon Ingram's Digital Plastique exhibition as installed at Gow Langsford. Simon Ingram, Composition jaune, 2017, oil on canvas, 100 x 900 mm Simon Ingram, Composition en gris, 2017, oil on canvas, 650 x 600 mm Simon Ingram's Digital Plastique exhibition as installed at Gow Langsford. Simon Ingram, Untitled, 2009, oil on canvas, 355 x 270 mm Simon Ingram, Peinture numero neuf, 2017, oil on canvas, 1000 x 900 mm Simon Ingram, Untitled, 2017, oil on canvas, 1000 x 900 mm Simon Ingram's Digital Plastique exhibition as installed at Gow Langsford.

There is also interest in inconsistency or saturation of colour, the way that in a stroke the hue becomes anaemic, losing over distance its chromatic power so that a continuous line becomes watery. Then there are the lines that result from wet strokes being applied on wet backgrounds; the supporting colour underneath creating a streaky marbling effect within the robot-drawn linear vector. These lines are normally more rigid and less frenetic than the wobblier hand-drawn flourishes.

Auckland

 

Simon Ingram
Digital Plastique

 

31 May-24 June 2017

The notion of partnership or team collaboration is the central concept in this show, a suite of nearly a dozen Simon Ingram paintings where human spontaneity is paired up with robotic preplanning (ie. programmed mark-making responses) - in order to bring interesting nuances to brusherly paint application and sticky, subtly agitated, grounds. Figuring out the chronological sequence of events is part of the viewer’s fun, deciding what has gone over, under, across or into the most salient image details; who (or what) made it, and which end of each painted stroke is the beginning.

When analysing the images one can consider which marks are (directly) human-made and quickly executed, and which are more slowly constructed by electronically programmed blocks of Lego holding brushes that daub and smear. Plus what has been obliterated - or made over-complicated - over time from the back-and-forth (robot-human) processes, or two robotic or human bursts in a row, so that traces of all that activity are now only partially seen.

There is also interest in inconsistency or saturation of colour, the way that in a stroke the hue becomes anaemic, losing over distance its chromatic power so that a continuous line becomes watery. Then there are the lines that result from wet strokes being applied on wet backgrounds; the supporting colour underneath creating a streaky marbling effect within the robot-drawn linear vector. These lines are normally more rigid and less frenetic than the wobblier hand-drawn flourishes.

Ingram initially composed these linear images on his Android phone (titled by where he was at the time), and blown up onto much larger canvases they become enigmatic diagrams with simple geometric shapes. Inside them are repeated patterns of short diagonal bars that hover in spread-out formation. Machine-drawn grids of lines are wrapped around bundles of squiggly hand-drawn marks, inserting freehand scribbles into diagonal patterns. We ask ourselves: are some of the short marks placed by the computer between the longer ones, or is it the other way round? Which set came first? Sometimes it is obvious; other times it isn’t. And after that ‘exchange’, then what?

Of course in the end, it is really Ingram A playing a tennis-like game with Ingram B, seeing the pre-planned robot doesn’t genuinely think in an off-the-cuff, impulsive or explorative sense. Still, we are forced to analyse mark quality: location, duration, tone, hue, background smudges and pigment consistency. Looking for processual clues. Enjoying Ingram‘s playful, mock-schizoid, cyber-expressionism, but about effect, not affect. Its construction via a conceptual elasticity of crisscrossing procedures.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Richard Killeen, Alive in New Zealand, 1971, oil on hardboard, 420 x 570 mm

Oafish’ AND Urbane Killeen

IVAN ANTHONY GALLERY

Auckland

 

Richard Killeen
Forty-Eight Years In Between

 

5 June - 29 June 2019

JH
PĀNiA!, Honorary Consulate (Mobile Cardboard Detachment) (2019), cardboard, adhesive, masking tape, plastic toy lawn mower.  49 x 31.5 x 78 cm.  Photo: Arekahānara

Ambassadorial Preoccupations

MOKOPŌPAKI

Auckland

 

PᾹNiA!, Yllwbro, A.A.M. Bos
The Dutch Embassy


1 May - 22 June 2019

JH
Ron Left, Escalator 4, 2017, acrylic and digital photography on aluminium, 900 x 1600 mm

Ron Left’s Media Hybridity

ARTIS Gallery

Auckland

 

Ron Left
Shadow Series

 

11 June - 24 June, 2019

JH
Mark Schroder, 'Goldkorp' as installed at RM. Detail. Photo: Sam Hartnett

Schroder’s Allegorical Installation

RM

Auckland

 

Mark Schroder
Goldkorp

 

22 May - 7 June 2019